Cardinals
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John King | 28 | Majors | RP | Medium | 4.4 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
| Tekoah Roby | 21 | Minors | SP | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 5.6 | |||||
| Thomas Saggese | 21 | Minors | 2B | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.9 |
Total Value:
7.2
Rangers
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Montgomery | 30 | Majors | SP | Medium | 0.4 | 11 | 3.6 | 7.4 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 8.8 | |
| Chris Stratton | 32 | Majors | RP | High | 0.4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 1.2 |
Total Value:
8.4

Maybe, but that hasn't been reflected in any of the latest updates from the prospect evaluators.
I think FG 50fv'd Roby and he is in the top 100
He has not been very impressive at all in the minors. 4.64 ERA in high A across 22 starts in 2022, and a 5.05 ERA across 10 starts this year in AA. Not seeing the upside here, if anything he's valued too highly because I feel like Saggs is much better.
Don’t use ERA to evaluate pitching prospects. He has a strong FIP this year and he’s got good stuff. Fangraphs had him in the top 100 prospects going into this year
dont use ERA? lmao that's some premium cope right there, there's a reason ERA is the stat referenced most with pitchers, it's what you actually gave up
We don't use ERA in our model, and based on our conversations with front offices, they don't use it (or at least not much) either. It was created over 100 years ago when there wasn't much else being tracked, and therefore it became institutionalized, and baseball is slow to change. But analysts all know it's outdated, noisy, and has little predictive value. The concept makes sense, in that a pitcher's job is run prevention, but despite its name, ERA doesn't do a good job of measuring that. Most of the old pitching stats (win/loss, saves, holds) are in the same boat. They've all been replaced by better versions.
ERA is good for measuring past performance. Outcome is what matters most, right? But FIP and other ERA estimators are better for measuring a pitcher's actual talent, and thus, future performance.